Saturday, December 21, 2024
HomeMessagingBeta Applies to Messaging Too: Rogers On Demand Online

Beta Applies to Messaging Too: Rogers On Demand Online

I was invited to preview the new Rogers On Demand Online service this week and it got me thinking about beta programs and marketing (note for non-Canadian readers: Rogers is one of Canada’s leading providers of cable TV, high speed Internet access and wireless services.).  The event was a blogger sneak preview of the service which has just entered beta this week and is slated for general release on Nov. 30th.   The new service has lots of innovative features.  It gives Rogers subscribers online access to premium TV content, movies, sports and kids programs.  It lets you access that content anytime, anywhere (in Canada) and you can have multiple computers in your household accessing different content at the same time.  The event was held in a private screening room in a hotel which gave the Rogers folks the chance to show off the great work they’ve done on the very clean and intuitive UI.  Mobile support is coming in Q2 next year.

For product marketers, the neat thing about holding an event like this in the age of Twitter is that not only do you get to see what people like and didn’t like about the features of the product, you also get to see how well the group understood your messaging by how they translate it down into 140 characters (and over the next few days in blog posts).  The other interesting thing is to watch the reaction from folks that aren’t in the room but are following the stream on Twitter.  I understand that one grumpy or happy person doesn’t prove that your messaging is or isn’t working but you can get some indication of what’s getting people interested, what isn’t, and folks want to hear more about.

In the case of this event the folks in the room were clearly wowed by the user experience.  People were snapping pictures and there was a lot of positive discussion around how beautiful the web site looked.  The ability to have multiple users watching different shows at the same time was a hit. The ad-supported model didn’t seem to phase anyone (there was a question about whether you would have the watch the ads if you watched a program for a second time – you don’t).  There were questions around which Rogers customers were entitled to which content and the answers (premium subscribers get premium content, wireless and other customers get over the air content, “deep library” shows and movies) seemed to satisfy both the crowd and the folks following the event online.

On the negative side, there was clearly skepticism both in the room and on Twitter around the bandwidth required to stream this content and whether or not folks would have to upgrade their plans to handle the increase in their data usage.  If you don’t live in Canada, I can tell you that data is expensive here compared to the U.S. and in my opinion it’s the number 1 reason people are grumpy about their access providers/carriers in general, Rogers being no exception. A cynical person could see this “free” service as merely a way to get users to upgrade their plans to increase their monthly data cap.

In chatting with the Rogers folks after the presentation, they had a clear response to this concern (even though they didn’t address it clearly in the presentation).  First of all they claim that the number of customers exceeding their data caps is very, very small. Secondly, at 500MB for a 45-minute show, watching 100 TV shows would only burn up about half of their mid-range plan’s data allowance.  Again, according to Rogers, for the vast majority of customers, their existing plans will easily handle the increased usage.  (Aside: Mobile data plans are a whole other story but since this service doesn’t go mobile until mid next year, I’ll reserve judgment on that one for now.) Rogers was also quick to point out that you do not need to be a Rogers high speed subscriber to use the
service.

All of that makes sense to me however this particular crowd were heavy online users and therefore more likely to be the folks hitting the wall today.  Although they may only represent a small slice of Rogers customers, they were selected as folks that will be early adopters of the service and as such, their concerns matter because they will be heard by the more general population of users who may end up worrying about something that isn’t in fact an issue for them.  I thought overall the Rogers folks did a great job in the session of trying to be open and honestly answering questions.  Hopefully part of what they
will learn in the beta is that founded or not, data usage for this service is a concern that they are going to have to tackle at a minimum in their messaging and they will need to back it up with facts and figures that prove their point.

Which brings me back to the title of this post.  Too often I think companies run beta programs as strictly a way for them to get feedback on products but it’s just as important for messaging and positioning. Figuring out what your detractors will say in response to a new offering gives you have the opportunity to refute the claim in your launch messaging and gather the data you need to back up your position.  You won’t make 100% of the folks out there happy but at
least you’ll be ready with the facts and not left responding to an unanticipated concern in the heat of a product launch.

Subscribe to this blog! Do it now!

RELATED ARTICLES

9 COMMENTS

  1. Thanks for the lo-down on the new Rogers on-demand online service … seems that us folks up here in Ottawa don’t get sneak peeks. I look forward to checking out what they’ve done.
    You are spot-on with with not only using Betas to show what users can do, but also to use Betas for test-driving your messaging and various business items associated with the new product (or in this case the service).

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Ashawndra Edwards on Choosing a New Vertical Market
marcelene28 on Startup Marketing Podcast
Name: Johanna on How to Name Your Startup
Samuel Riksfjord on A Value Proposition Worksheet
Vivian Dilberd on Startup Marketing 101
Krissie Thornton on A Value Proposition Worksheet
Krissie Thornton on A Value Proposition Worksheet
David Locke on Startup Marketing Vs. Art
Justin Graf on Startup Marketing Vs. Art
Randomarketer on Startup Marketing Vs. Art
i2i-management.com on 3 Startup Branding Mistakes
Tim Johnson on Startup Messaging
Paul Bevan on Vertical Marketing 101
Tim Johnson on Vertical Marketing 101
Tim Johnson on Vertical Marketing 101
Alex Nimson on Vertical Marketing 101
Tim Johnson on Influencers Suck
Tim Johnson on Influencers Suck
Tim Johnson on Influencers Suck
Faisal on Influencers Suck
Kerry on Influencers Suck
Jonathan Beech on Influencers Suck
Martin Stimp on A New Marketing Framework
Tim Johnson on A New Marketing Framework
Sam Title on Press/Media Pages 101
Jonathan Beech on How to Name Your Startup
Tim Johnson on How to Name Your Startup
Johnson Choy on Startup Marketing Podcast
Andy Donovan on Startup Marketing Podcast
Maggie Jones on Startup Marketing Podcast
Joseph Dill on Startup Launches RIP
mrsprpro on Startup Launches RIP
topsy_top20k on Startup Launches RIP
JonMaster on Startup Marketing 101
topsy_top20k on Startup Marketing 101
Tony Wilson on I’m the #1 PM Blogger!
Jason Serres on I’m the #1 PM Blogger!
My boss is a Flintstone on Collateral Damage: Building a Content Plan
Steve Matthews on Spam is not Marketing
Mara Krieps on Finding First Customers
Carole-Ann Matignon on ProductCamp NYC
Adam Bullied on ProductCamp NYC
Andreas on ProductCamp NYC
Stewart Rogers on ProductCamp NYC
Roger L. Cauvin on The Art of the Customer Quote
April Dunford on Making it Real
April Dunford on Marketing Penalty Cards
April Dunford on Unhappy Customers Complain